PERLOCATIVE PRAGMATICS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT INTERROGATIVE SPEECH ACTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

The article analyzes the concepts of categories of direct and indirect communication in linguistics, types and features of indirect interrogative speech acts, reveals the prelocutive pragmatics of direct and indirect interrogative speech acts in the Kazakh language. Namely: if the direct meaning of interrogative sentences is getting an answer, then indirect questions are used in such functions as showing politeness, indirect posing a question, emphasizing a request, posing a question in a suspicious expression, transmitting a request with gestures, evaluation, resentment, chagrin. In a direct interrogative speech act, the illocutionary effect is expressed through the linguistic meaning of the linguistic means that make up speech, while the perlocutionary pragmatics of indirect interrogative speech acts depends on the use of language units in a figurative sense, on the background knowledge of the speaker and listener and the conditions of communication. At the same time, an indirect interrogative speech act enhances the artistic potential of the language and allows expressing various semantic shades.

The study used methods of structural grammar «from form to meaning», functional grammar «from meaning to form», structural-semantic description, functional-semantic and contextual analysis, differentiation and hypothetical interpretation.

The scientific and theoretical basis of the scientific conclusions obtained in the course of the study were the works on structural, communicative, functional grammar and pragmatic linguistics in linguistics. In addition, the given language examples from various sources (colloquial speech, works of poets and writers) contributed to the argumentation of scientific and practical conclusions presented in the article

1. Anscombre J.-C., Ducrot O. L’argumentation dans la langue. Philosophie et langague. – Bruxelles: P. Mardaga, 1983. – 184 p. (in France)

2. Austin J.L. How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. – 166 p. (in English)

3. Davison A. Indirect Speech Acts and What to Do with Them. – Syntax and Semantics. – Vol. 3. – Speech Acts. N.Y., 1975. – P. 142-185. (in English)

4. Wunderlich D. Studien zur Sprechakttheorie / D. Wunderlich. – Frankfurt/ M.: Suhrkamp, 1976. – 416 s. (in German)

5. Searle J. Indirect Speech Acts. – Syntax and Semantics. – Vol. 3. Speech Acts. – N.Y., etc.: Academic Press, 1975. – P. 59-82. (in English)

6. Shehdeh Fareh, Maher Bin Moussa. Pragmatic Functions of Interrogative Sentences in English: A Corpus-based Study. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES) Vol. 9, 2008. – P. 145-164.

7. Vezhbitcka A., Rechevye akty. – Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. – Vyp. 358: Lingvisticheskaia pragmatika. – M.: Ptogress, 1985. – S. 251-275. [Vezhbitska A. Speech acts. – New in foreign linguistics. – Issue 358: Linguistic Pragmatics. – Moscow: Progress, 1985. – P. 251-275] (in Russian)

8. Gak V.G. Iazykovye preobrazovania. – M., 1998. – 763 s. [Gak V.G. Language transformations. – M., 1998. – 763 p.] (in Russian)

9. Galperin I.R. Tekst kak obekt lingvisticheskogo issledovania / Otv.red. G.V. Stepanov. Izd-e 6-e. – M.: URSS, 2008. – 137 s. [Galperin I. R. Text as an object of linguistic research / Ed. G.V. Stepanov. Ed. 6-E. – M.: URSS, 2008. – 137 p.] (in Russian)

10. Dementev V.V. Nepriamaia kommunikatsia. – M.: Gnozis, 2006. – 376 s. [Dementyev V.V. Indirect communication. – M.: Gnosis, 2006. – 376 p.] (in Russian)

11. Erofeeva E.V. Pragmaticheskie aspekty rechevyh aktov razlishnoi kommunikativnoi napravlennosti v sovremennom frantsuzkom iazyke. Monografia / E. V. Erofeeva; FGBOU VPO «Ural. gos. ped. Un-t». – Ekaterinburg, 2014. – 287 s. [Erofeeva E.V. Pragmatic aspects of speech acts of various communicative orientation in the modern French language. Monograph / E. V. Erofeeva; FGBOU VPO «Ural. gos. ped. un-t». – Yekaterinburg, 2014. – 287 s.] (in Russian)

12. Конрад Р. Voprositelnye predlozhenia kak kosvemmye rechevye akte. – Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. – Vyp. XVI: Lingvisticheskaia pragmatika. – M., 1986. – S. 349-384. [Konrad R. Interrogative sentences as indirect speech acts. – New in foreign linguistics. – Issue XVI: Linguistic pragmatics. – M., 1986. – P. 349-384] (in Russian)

13. Koshikbaeva G.D., Elikbayev B.K., Ybyraiym A.O. Surau mandi soileu aktisindegi propozitsia, presuppozitsia zhane postpositsia. – «Orandyq tiltanym damuynun qurylymdyq, kommunikativtik, antropoozektik modustary» anny qalyqaralyq gylymi-teorialyq konferensia materialdary. – Almaty 2023. – 172-176-bb. [Koshikbaeva G.D., Elikbayev B.K., Abraham A.O. Propositions, presuppositions and postpositions in the act of interrogative speech. – Materials of the international scientific and theoretical conference «Structural, communicative, anthropospecific modes of development of domestic linguistics». – Almaty, 2023. – P. 172-176.] (in Kazahk)

14. Oshaqbaeva Zh.B. Pragmaticheskaia sostavliaiuchaia iazykovoi kompetentsii vo vtorom iazyke: Diss. ... kand. philol. Nauk: 10.02.19 – teoria iazyka. – Almaty, 2009. – 154 s. [Oshakbaeva Zh. B. Pragmatic language competence in the second language: Diss. ... kand. philol. Nauk: 10.02.19 – theory language. – Almaty, 2009. – 154 p.] (in Russian)

15. Pocheptsov G.G. Theoria kommunikatsii. – M.: «Refl-buk», K.: «Vakler», 2001. – 466 s. [Pocheptsov G.G. Theory of communication. – M.: «Refl-buk», K.: «Vakler», 2001. – 466 p.] (in Russian)

16. Pocheptsov G.G. Osnovy pragmaticheskogo opisania predlozhenia. – Kiev: Vishcha shkola, 1986. – 116 s. [Pocheptsov O.G. Fundamentals of the pragmatic description of the proposal. – Kiev: Vishcha shkola, 1986. – 116 p.] (in Russian)

17. Serl J.R. Kosvennye rechevye akty. – Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. – Vyp. 17: Teoria rechevyq aktov. – M.: Ptogress, 1985. – S. 251-275. [Serl J.R. Indirect speech acts. – New in foreign linguistics. – Issue 17: Theory of speech acts. – M.: Progress, 1986. – P. 195-222] (in Russian)

18. Sternin I.A. Vvedenie v rechevoe vozdeisrvie. – Voronezh, 2011. – 227 s. [Sternin I.A. Introduction to speech influence. – Voronezh, 2011. – 227 p.] (in Russian)

19. Shevchenko I.S. Istoricheskaia dinamika pragmatiki predlozhenia: angliiskoe voprositelnoe predlozhenie 16-20 vv. Monografia. – Harkov: Konstant, 1998. – 168 s. [Shevchenko I.S. Historical dynamics of Sentence Pragmatics: English Interrogative sentence of the 16th-20th centuries: Monograph. – Kharkiv: Constant, 1998. – 168 p.] (in Russian)