THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND FORMATION OF ADVERBIAL SUFFIXES -YP, -IP (based on the monuments of Mamluk Kipchak)

There has been no in-depth, comprehensive and systematic study of the history of one of the complex grammatical categories of verbs-the category of adverbs, although it is found only slightly in some monuments and textbooks concerning the history of a particular language. One of the urgent problems of Kazakh Turkological science is a comprehensive study of the Turkic languages of any linguistic unity in historical periods, a comprehensive study of them from a synchronous and diachronic point of view and determining the level of historical continuity in comparison with our modern language.

The article examines the grammatical function of the adverbial suffixes -yp, -ip, -up, -üp, -p in the Mamluk-Kipchak language, their influence and phonetic variants on the meaning of the word to which it is attached, the history of development and formation. The research is based on the materials of 5 monuments written in the Mamluk-Kipchak language and extant to the present day. The research work is based on the main method of studying the historical development of language - the comparative historical method.

Phonetic variants of adverbial forms with suffixes -yp, -ip, -up, -üp, -p the order of attachment to the root, various semantic gradients in the main and indirect meanings, all of them do not differ much from modern Turkic languages, including Kazakh. Some features have been preserved in the modern Oguz language, and some in Kipchak. Even small differences between them can be considered as a natural phenomenon that arises during the historical development of the language.

1. Ağar Mehmet Emin (1989). Kitab Fi’l-Fıkh Bi-Lisani’t-Turki (İnceleme-Metin-Sözlük). Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1989. (in Turkish)

2. Dilbas Ebru (2017). Türk Dilinde Zarf Fiil Ekleri. (in Turkish)

3. http://www.academia.edu/27582365/T%C3%9CRK_D%C4%B0L%C4%B0NDE_ZARFF%C4%B0%C4%B0L_EKLER%C4%B0, (06.07.2017).

4. Eminoğlu Emin (2011). Abbas İbn Hamza es-Sabrani Kitabü’l Ef’al. Akçağ yayınları: – Ankara, 2011. (in Turkish)

5. Ergin Muarrem (2009). Türk Dil Bilgisi. Bayrak Basım: – İstanbul, 2009. (in Turkish)

6. Gülsevin G. (2000). Türkiye Türkçesinde Birleşik Zarf Fiiller. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2000. – S.5. – S.122-143. (in Turkish)

7. Korkina E.I. (1985). Deeprichastie v yakutskom yazyke. – Novоsibirsk, 1985. (in Russian)

8. Korkmaz Z. (2007). Gramer Terimleri Sözlüğü, Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı. Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları. – Ankara, 2007.(in Turkish)

9. Korkmaz Z. (2007). Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri-Şekil Bİlgisi. Ankara: Türk Dili Kurumu Yayınları, 2007. (in Turkish)

10. Kuanışbayev Ercan (2006). Kitab fi’l-Fıkh (Giriş-Metin-Dizin-Tıpkıbasım). Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü: – Istanbul, 2006. (in Turkish)

11. Mamanov Y. (1966). Qazirgi qazaq tili. – Almaty, 1966. (in Kazakh)

12. Mamanov Y. (2014). Qazaq til biliminin maseleleri. Abzal-ai: – Almaty, 2014. (in Kazakh)

13. Orazov M. (2001). Etistik. – Almaty: Y. Altynsarin atyndagy bilim akademyasynyn respublikalyq baspa kabinteti, 2001. (in Kazakh)

14. Sadykbekov K. (2016). Kitab Mukaddime Ebu Leys es-Semerkandi eskertkishi jane onyn tili. Tanbalı baspası: –Almaty, 2016. (in Kazakh)

15. Uğurlu Mustafa (1984). Munyetu’l Guzzat. Metin-İndeks, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi: –Ankara, 1984. (in Turkish)

16. Ysqaqov A. (1974). Qazirgi qazaq tili. – Almaty, 1974. (in Kazakh)

17. Yuldashev A.A. (1977). Sootnoshenie deeprichastnih i lichnih form glagola v tyurkskih yazykah. – Moskva, 1977. (in Russian)