ZOOTOPONYMS AS A SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL CODE

The article, based on zootoponyms, determines the population's knowledge of social status and taste in choosing names. On the social basis of motivation for toponyms, the soul, harmony and identity of the people are preserved, therefore, naming combines the social aspects and psychological foundations of the people. Particular attention is paid to the cognitive function, according to the stored experience of the population in zootoponyms as national knowledge, socio-psychological code, in the disclosure of information. The pragmatic potential of names (direction, feature of an object, etc.) has been studied and their place as a means of conveying the perception of the world has been determined.

The purpose of the article is to determine the social and psycholinguistic features of zootoponyms based on an analysis of their meaning, to determine the role of the population in the creation of zootoponyms as a socio-psychological code. Analysis of information related to social and psychological motives in zootoponyms, development and systematization of scientific justification.

Research methods: statistical method, typological method, descriptive method, questionnaire, conceptual, component (semantic) analysis.

The research work was carried out in the lexical-semantic, cognitive direction.

Zootoponyms are a socio-psychological code that determines the existence of a people due to a secondary name: on the one hand, cultural knowledge, on the other hand, a way of life, on the third hand, a sign, an object.

The practical significance of the article lies in the fact that its main results can be used in theoretical courses such as sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, onomastics, cognitive linguistics, linguoculturology, as well as in seminars on teaching the Kazakh language.

1. Aqbaqaj (tekst) – Ander.kz (in Kazakh).

2. Abdrahmanov A. (1991) Istoriko-jetimologicheskoe issledovanie toponimov Kazahstana. – Nauchnyj doklad po opublikovannym trudam, predstavlennyj k zashhite na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora filologicheskih nauk. [Abdrakhmanov A. (1991) Historical and etymological study of toponyms of Kazakhstan. – Scientific report on published work, presented to protect the competition of the academic degree of doctor of philological sciences]. – Alma-Ata, 1991. – 58 s. (in Russian)

3. Basik S.N. (2018) Kommodifikacija toponimii kak fenomen social'no-jekonomicheskoj i kul'turnoj geografii [Basik S.N. (2018) Commodification of toponymy as a phenomenon of socio-economic and cultural geography]. – Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija: Estestvennyje nauki. – 2018. – №2. – 146 s. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7189-2018-2-59-70 (in Russian)

4. Dmitrieva L.M. (2002) Ontologicheskoe i mental'noe bytie toponimicheskoj sistemy (na materiale russkoj toponimii Altaja). [Dmitrieva L.M. Ontological and mental existence of the toponymic system (on the material of the Russian toponymy of Altai)] – Barnaul‚ 2002. – 367 s. (in Russian)

5. Eginbaeva A.E., Saparov Қ.T. (2022) Zoonimderdіng Shet audany toponimderіng zhasaudagy orny men erekshelіkterі [Eginbaeva A.E., Saparov K.T. (2002) The position and features of zoonyms in the creation of toponyms of Shet district]. – Gidrometeorologija i jekologija. – №3. – 2022. – S. 40-48. (in Kazakh)

6. Fatkullina F.G. (2015) Toponimy kak komponent jazykovoj kartiny mira [Fatkullina F.G. (2015) Toponymy as a component of the language picture of the world]. – Contemporary problems of science and education. – Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. – 2015. – №1-1. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=18126 (in Russian)

7. Golev N. D., Dmitrieva L. M. (2008) Edinstvo ontologicheskogo i mental'nogo bytija toponimicheskoj sistemy (k problematike kognitivnoj toponimiki) [Golev N. D., Dmitrieva L. M. (2008) The unity of ontological and mental existence of the toponymic system (to the problem of cognitive toponymy)]. – Voprosy onomastiki. – 2008. – №5. – 207 s. (in Russian)

8. Imanberdieva S.Q., Qulamanova Z.Ә., Bekenova G.Sh. (2021) Zhambyl oblysy toponimderіnіng kestelіk sozdіgі. [Imanberdieva S.K., Kulamanova Z.A., Bekenova G.Sh. (2021) Tabular dictionary of toponyms of Zhambyl region]. Nur- Sultan: Qajnar, 2021. – 465 b. (in Kazakh)

9. Imanberdieva S.Q., Tojshybaev Z., Malіkova S.Z. (2020) Soltystіk Qazaqstan oblysy toponimderі.– Nur-Sultan: «Shajsultan Shajahmetov atyndagy «Tіl-Qazyna» ulttyq gylymi-praktikalyq ortalygy» KEAQ, 2020. – 788 b. [Imanberdiyeva S.K., Toyshibayev Z., Malikova S.Z. (2020) Toponyms of the North Kazakhstan region] (in Kazakh)

10. Karabulatova I.S. (2002) Russkaja toponimija v jetnopsiholingvisticheskom aspekte. [Karabulatova I.S. Russian toponymy in ethnopsycholinguistic aspect]: diss. … doktora filologicheskih nauk. – Tver, 2002. – 502 s. (in Russian)

11. Karaulov Ju.N. (1987) Russkij jazyk i jazykovaja lichnost'. [Karaulov Yu.N. (1987) Russian language and linguistic personality]. – M.: Russkij jazyk, 1987. – 264 s. (in Russian)

12. Konkashpaev G.K. (1951) Kazahskie narodnye geograficheskie terminy. [Konkashpayev G.K. (1951) Kazakh folk geographical terms]. Izvestija AH KazSSR, serija geograf. – Alma-Ata, 1951. – S. 24-30.

13. Koroljova I.A. (2011) Jazykovye i kul'turnye kontakty v russko-belorusskom prigranich'e. [Koroleva I.A. (2011) Language and cultural contacts in the Russian-Belarusian border area. – Current problems of border areas of Belarus and the Russian Federation]. – Aktual'nye problemy prigranichnyh rajonov Belarusi i Rossijskoj Federacii. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. – Vitebsk, 2011. – S. 261-264. (in Russian)

14. Oraz Abaj (2017). Zhylqysy kіl kokmojnaq bul onіrdіng. – Argymaq Ulttyq tanymdyq portaly (argymaq.kz). [Abai Oraz. The horse Kil kokmoynak of this region. – Argymak national educational portal (argymaq.kz).] (in Kazakh).

15. Qaliev B. (2014) Qazaq tіlіnіng tүsіndіrme sozdіgі. [Kaliev B. (2014) Kazakstan tіlіnіn tүsіndіrme сөздігі]. – Almaty, 2014. – 728 b. (in Kazakh)

16. Qojshybaev E. Qazaqstannyng zher-su attary sozdіgі. [Koishybayev Y. (1986) Kazakhstan zher-su attara sozdigi]. – Almaty: Mektep, 1986. – 256 b.

17. Rubleva O.L. (2007) O lingvostranovedcheskom potenciale toponimov i o sootvetstvujushhem slovare [Jelektronnyj resurs] [Rubleva O. L. (2007) On the linguistic and cultural potential of toponyms and the corresponding dictionary [Electronic resource]. – Rossija – Vostok – Zapad. Problemy mezhkul'turnoj kommunikacii. Materialy nauchno- prakticheskoj konferencii. – 2007. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.toponimika.ru/index.php?id=80 (in Russian)

18. Rudakova A.V. (2019) Specifika psiholingvisticheskogo opisanija semantiki toponimov [Rudakova A.V. (2019) Specifics of the psycholinguistic description of the semantics of toponyms]. – Vestnik VGU. Serija: Filologija. Zhurnalistika. – 2019. – №1. – 175 s. (in Russian)

19. Shaun Lim Tyan Gin, Francesco Perono Cacciafoco. Toponyms as a Gateway to Society in: Old World: Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia. Volume 1 Issue 1 (2021) (brill.com) (in English)

20. Suprun V.I. (2000) Onomasticheskoe pole russkogo jazyka i ego hudozhestvenno-jesteticheskij potencial [Suprun V.I. (2000) Onomastic field of the Russian language and its artistic and aesthetic potential]: avtoref doktora filol. nauk. – Volgograd, 2000. – 80 s. (in Russian)

21. Tіleuberdiev B. (2016) Qazaq onomastikasyndagy dunienіng (galamnyng) toponimijalyq bejnesі [Tileuberdiyev B. (2016) Toponymic image of the world (universe) in Kazakh onomastics]. – Onomastikalyq habarshy. – №2 (32) – 2016. – 100 b. (in Kazakh)

22. Zhanuzaq T. (2021) Enbekterіnіng tolyq 5-tomdyq zhinagy. [Zhanuzaq T. (2021) Complete 5-volume collection of works]. – Almaty, 2021. (in Kazakh)