LINGUOCOGNITIVE AND LINGUOCULTURAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE PROCESSES OF TERMINOLOGIZATION IN MODERN KAZAKH AND TURKISH LANGUAGES

The intensification of the activity of the Kazakh language in accordance with its state status in all spheres of society, the renewal of its potential strengthened the connection of the language with the form of linguistic consumption, began to influence the requirements of everyday practice. This is evident from the active process of terminology creation in the social, economic, political, scientific and technical spheres. In addition, the core of the neonominational process, which created the interrelationships of language~ society, language~consciousness, language ~ culture, etc., is not only scientific and informational, but also cultural and social content. This is the basis for improving not only the quantitative, but also the qualitative level of modern language development. Therefore, the recognition of the influence of language and culture on each other in the form of new terms and the function of language as a unique means of transmitting culture within the framework of cultural representation is especially relevant. Based on this, new names and terms in the Kazakh language, which also serve as a unique feature of the cognitive level of language users, are considered in the article as a “linguistic picture of the world” in accordance with the process of updating the language. In this regard, the purpose of this article is to compare and characterize the linguocognitive and linguocultural foundations of terminologization processes in modern Kazakh and Turkish languages. The following methods were used in the course of the study: descriptive, comparative, cognitive, ethnolinguistic and conceptual. Also, to determine the cultural and national component structured in the mind of a native speaker in a terminologized word, diachronic, contrasting, definitive were used, and discursive analysis, connotative approach, and motivation methods were used to recognize the process of terminologization. The value of the research: by describing and showing the linguocognitive and linguocultural foundations of terminologization processes in modern Kazakh and Turkish languages, we contribute to the improvement and strengthening of the “Turkic world”. The linguistic data and conclusions presented in the article can be used as practical and theoretical material for research by students, undergraduates, doctoral students and young people studying at the faculties of Philology, Translation Studies, Oriental Studies and Turkology.

1. Ahatova, B.A. (2006) Politicheskij diskurs i jazykovoe soznanie. Almaty: Jekonomika. [Akhatova, B.A. (2006) Political Discourse and language formation. Almaty: Economika.] (in Russian)

2. Ajdarbek, Q. Zh. (2010) Qazaq terminologijalyq atalymynyng onomasiologijalyq negіzderі. Almaty. [Aidarbek, Q. Zh. (2010) Onomasiological foundations of the Kazakh terminological category. Almaty.] (in Kazakh)

3. Aksan, D. (1978) Anlam Bilim ve Türk Anlam Bilimi. Ankara: DTCF Yay. (in Turkish)

4. Aqaev, S. (2002) Terminnіng tanymdyq tabigaty: Filol. gyl. dokt. ... diss. Almaty. [Aqayev, S. (2002) Cognitive nature of the term: Philol. science. doct. ... diss. Almaty.] (in Kazakh) Bajtursynov, A. (1992) Tіl tagylymy (qazaq tіlі men oqu-agartuga qatysty engbekterі). Almaty: Ana tіlі, 448 b. [Baitursynov, A. (1992) Language lessons (works on the Kazakh language and education). Almaty: Ana tili, 448 p.] (in Kazakh)

5. Bekeyeva, N., Bissengali, A., Mankeyeva, Zh., Nurdauletova, B. (2021) Phraseological Expressions in the Turkic Language: Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language. October, Vol. 9, İss.2). Online ISSN: 2329-2210. P. 29-40. http://www.ijscl.net/article_246369_a805a494681221d1506373a57197b29b.pdf (in English)

6. Bisengali, A. (2016) Qazіrgі qazaq zhane turіk tіlderіndegі termindenu uderіsіnіng sipaty. Akademik O. Ajtbajuly zhane memlekettіk tіl maselelerі. Almaty. [Bissengali, A. The nature of the process of terminologization in modern Kazakh and Turkish languages. Academician U. Aitbaiuly and problems of the state language. Almaty.] (in Kazakh)

7. Bozşahin, C., Zeyrek D. (2000) Dilbilgisi, bilişim ve bilişsel bilim. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi. İstanbul: Simurg Yay. Sayı: 45. (in Turkish)

8. Humboldt, V. (2000) Izbrannye trudy po jazykoznaniju. Мoskva: Progress, 324 s. [Humboldt, V. (2000) Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 324 p.] (in Russian)

9. Dilaçar, A. (1963) Atatürk ve Türkçe. Atatürk ve Türk Dili. Ankara: TDK Yay., S. 41-52. (in Turkish)

10. Dosmuhameduly H. (1992) Alaman. Almaty: Ana tіlі. [Dosmukhameduly Kh. (1992) Alaman. Almaty: Ana tili.] (in Kazakh)

11. Eker, S. (2015) Çağdaş Türk Dili. 9. Baskı. Ankara: Grafiker, 478 s. (in Turkish)

12. Ibraeva Zh. (2010) Jazyk politiki i politika jazyka. Tarih taqylymy. [Ibrayeva Zh. (2010) Language politics and politics of language. History lessons.]

13. İmer, K. (1991) Türkçenin sözvarlığındakî yeni öğeler. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, S. 18-28. (in Turkish)

14. Isaqova, S.S. (2008) Qazaq termintanymynyng kognitivtіk-pragmatikalyq aspektіsі: Filol. gyl. dokt. ... diss. Almaty. [Isaqova, S. S. (2008) Cognitive-pragmatic aspect of Kazakh terminology: Philol. science. doct. ... diss. Almaty.] (in Kazakh)

15. Krasnyh, V.V. (2002) Jetnopsiholingvistika i lingvokul'turologija. Moskva: Gnozis. [Krasnykh, V.V. (2002) Ethnopsycholinguistics and linguoculturology. Moscow: Gnosis.] (in Russian)

16. Kutlusoy, Z. (2004) Bilişsel Bilim. Felsefe Ansiklopedisi. ed. Ahmet Cevizci. Cilt 2. İstanbul: Etik Yayınları, S. 596-612. (in Turkish)

17. Lotman, Ju.M. (2000) Semiosfera. Sankt-Peterburg: Iskusstvo, 704 s. [Lotman Y.M. (2000) Semiosphere. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo, 704 p.] (in Russian)

18. Özdemir, E. (1973) Terim Hazırlama Kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 102 s. (in Turkish)

19. Qajdarov, A. T. (1993) Qazaq terminologijasyna zhangasha kozqaras. QR UGA Habarlary. Tіl, adebiet serijasy, №1, 2 [Qaidarov, A. T. (1993) A new approach to Kazakh terminology. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Language, literature series, No. 1, 2] (in Kazakh)

20. Qozhaeva, M. (2007) Audarmatanu terminderіnіng kognitivtіk-semantikalyq negіzderі: Filol. gyl. kand. ... diss. Almaty. [Qozhayeva, M. (2007) Cognitive and semantic foundations of translation studies terms: Philol. science. kand. ... diss. Almaty.] (in Kazakh)

21. Qurmanbajuly, Sh. (1998) Qazaq leksikasynyng termindenuі. Almaty: Gylym, 208 b. [Qurmanbaiuly, Sh. (1998) Terminologization of Kazakh vocabulary. Almaty: Qylym, 208 p.] (in Kazakh)

22. Qajdar, A. (2009; 2013) Qazaqtar ana tіlі alemіnde (I-III t.). Almaty: Dajk-press. [Qaidar, A. (2009; 2013) Kazakhs in the world of their native language (I-III vol.). Almaty: Dyke-Press.] (in Kazakh)

23. Syzdyq, R. (2004) Sozder sojlejdі. Almaty: Sanat. [Syzdyq, R. (2004) Words speak. Almaty: Sanat.] (in Kazakh)

24. Telija, V.N. (1986) Konnotativnyj aspekt semantiki nominativnyh edinic. Moskva: Nauka. [Telia, V.N. (1986) The connotative aspect of the semantics of nominative units. Moscow: Science.] (in Russian)

25. Vardar, B. (2005) Terimbilim ve Yeni Sözcükleme: Terimden Anlama, Dilbilim Yazıları. M. Durak (ed.), İstanbul: Multilingual Yayınları. (in Turkish)

26. Zhanpeіsov, E. (1989) Jetnokul'turnaja leksika kazahskogo jazyka (na materialah proizvedenij M. Aujezova). Almaty: Nauka. [Zhanpeissov, Y. (1989) Ethnocultural vocabulary of the Kazakh language (based on the materials of M. Auezov's works). Almaty: Science.] (in Russian)

27. Zhubanov, Q. (1966) Qazaq tili zhonindegi zertteuler. Almaty: Gylym. [Zhubanov, Q. (1966) Research on the Kazakh language. Almaty: Science.] (in Kazakh)

28. Zülfikar, H. (1991) Terim Sorunları ve Terim Yapma Yolları. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 213 s. (in Turkish)